RE: GTK+ or QT ???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am no expert with this, but I did some testing with GTK+ and QT
and found out that GTK+ was more pthread(native kernel threads) friendly
than QT.

I could be wrong I only did some preliminary testing/evaluation. 

On Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:29 PM, Thomas Dodd [SMTP:ted@xxxxxxxxxxx]
wrote:
> 
> 
> John wrote:
> > My own bias favours KDE over Gnome because
> > .  I believe C++ a better programming language for this kind of work
> > than C. It does more to help programmers avoid silly errors such as
> > buffer overruns.
> 
> Are the C++ bindings for gnome? I know GTK+ has GTK--.
> 
> > .  I think the recent move in Gnome to this button order in dialogues
> >   <help> ..... <ok>
> >    defeats one of the goals espoused in the Gnome standards/guidelines
of
> > making UIs consistent and easy to use. Older Gnome, KDE, OS/2 and
> > Windows has "ok" or equivalent on the viewer's left.
> 
> It believe that, like the buttons in KDE is changable.
> see the recent OSNews.com article here 
> <http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=2997>
> 
> I imagine the GNOME HIG developers had a reason for that placement.
> 
> 	-Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-devel-list mailing list
> Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux