RE: pthread_mutex_lock call hangs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



But IS THAT POSSIBLE?? I mean that release mode binaries do not report a
deadlock?? 

Only difference between two build is of "-g" flag. There is no extra
code written in speacial debug flags (e.g DEBUG or _DEBUG" in MY CODE.


-----Original Message-----
From: Don Dade [mailto:ddade@digitalstatecraft.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:20 AM
To: redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: pthread_mutex_lock call hangs


Hi Ajay, 

This is the normal sequence for LinuxThreads pthread_mutex_lock(). I
would 
guess that you've got a very subtle bug that is causing a deadlock when
you 
compile and run with debugging turned on. 

I'd go through the code and find all the possible ways in which you
could 
have nested mutex locks, and see if you find any two sequences that
contain 
a pair in reversed order. These will be the potential deadlocks. Or, if
it's 
feasible, could you put a cout around all your locks and unlocks to see
what 
two mutices are deadlocked? 

It sure sounds like a deadlock, not something wrong with the call. 

HTH, 

Don 

Ajay Bansal writes: 

> may be somebody over here can answer this
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ajay Bansal
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:36 PM
> To: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: pthread_mutex_lock call hangs 
> 
> 
> Hi All
>  
> I am on RH73, gcc 3.2.1
>  
> I have a scenario in which, only if the code is in debug mode, 
> pthread_mutex_lock call hangs. following is the trace given by pstack 
> command.
>  
> 0x420292e5: __sigsuspend + 0x21 (bfffd52c, 20, bfffd52c, 404e3ef5, 
> 10000, 10) + 90
> 0x404d7679: __pthread_wait_for_restart_signal + 0x59 (404e00a0, 
> 402f6b14, 402ee2c4, 404d945e, 18, 40c4ecc4) + 50
> 0x404d94b9: __pthread_alt_lock + 0x69 (8100108, 0, 402c2234, 404d60be,

> 0, 4000b022) + 10
> 0x404d6116: __pthread_mutex_lock + 0x66 (81000f8, 400, 40ac7bac, 400, 
> 403401ea, 4036e170)
>  
> What could be the reason. Please note that the code works great if has

> been built in the release mode.
>  
> TIA
> Ajay Bansal
>  
>  
 



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux