What does "instability" specifically refer to? Were they only shown to cause instability in certain cases or was it general access? It should be noted that even if it is mentioned here what was definitely shown to cause instability, that does not mean that other situations will be stable. It only refers to the specific cases that are definitely NOT stable. I would still see any situation as a "use at your own risk" situation. It's just that if RedHat has determined specific cases where instability is shown, the users in that environment don't need to waste their time testing, it just doesn't work period. Chris Tooley On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 21:22, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Peter Bowen (pzb@datastacks.com) said: > > On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:13, Todd Lee wrote: > > > Thanks for the info! I guess I'll keep searching! When you did try to > > > implement ACL support with the RedHat kernel, what patch did you use, and > > > when you got it working which one did you use? Thanks in advance! > > > > The EA/ACL patches are actually in the kernel SRPM for RH kernels >= > > 2.4.18-14, you just need to enable them. > > Note that they were disabled *because* they caused instability. Use > at your own risk. :) > > Bill > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-devel-list mailing list > Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
