Re: optimised glibc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 15:08, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> 
> Also since not all back ends are of equal quality at times "optimizing"
> for the processor brings a slowdown: the K6 will run faster on code who
> is compiled with -mcpu=i686 than with -march=k6 and that is valid both
> for gcc 2.96 and 3.2.
> 
> Benchmark first and draw conclusions later: for instance you could
> assume that code optimized for Pentium will run faster than code for
> 386 when CPU is a 686.  Wrong.

In a nutshell, you're saying that gcc sucks.
Don't get me wrong, i don't say you're not right. But one would expect a
compiler to do "the right thing". Seems like gcc doesn't.

-- 
Florin Andrei

If you wear a tinfoil hat nowadays, people will just think
you're advertising for some Mel Gibson movie.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
Redhat-devel-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Red Hat General]     [Fedora]     [Red Hat Install]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux