Jag wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Levente Farkas wrote: > > > it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide > > THere is one. And not only that, you sent that mailing list requesting > its existance. From > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/README: > > http://developer.redhat.com will host a web site devoted to Raw Hide, > and > the redhat-devel-list@redhat.com mailing list will be the centerpiece of > discussion. IMHO it'd not be useful (even if the readme said that) in this case redhat-devel-list would be full of rawhide's problem. and even rh doesn't agree with it (see below). Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > John Ellson <ellson@lucent.com> writes: > > > Levente Farkas wrote: > > > > >hi, > > >first of all IMHO it's a good think that rawhide is updated regualry (almost > > >every day), on the other hand it'd be useful to be always consistent. > > >it'd be useful to create a new mailing list for rahide. yes I know I can > > >put bugreport into bugbase, but for a daily changing "distibution" it's > > > too expensive and it's not easy to track. > > > > Question to the primary RawHide maintainers: Is this true? I would > > like to know how we can help you best. Would you like us to > > submit RawHide bugs via BugZilla, or via this list (or one like it)? > > Bugzilla. I vote agaist bugzilla in this case. I put bugreports about rh distro into bugzilla, but rawhide is changing so rapidly, that I (and I assume many other people) would not like to use bugzilla. there are dozens of dependency bugs and other spec file specific bugs in rahide. it's much easier to cut-n-paste the result of an rpm and send it vie email than go to the web fill the form ... yes I'm lazy, but most case it can help a lot if I send an email (at least more than if I neither send a mail nor create a bugreport). yes if you want I can choose the easier way: don't report anything:-) -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
