Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> writes: > On 9 Mar 2002, Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote: > > Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> writes: > > > > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:33:37PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > Pete Peterson (petersonp@genrad.com) said: > > > > > > They have 7.2 packages, but I tried 'rpm --rebuild'ing the SRPMs from there > > > > > > for my 6.2 systems and the rebuild failed with a pile of errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > ... So I'm hoping Red Hat comes up with theirs soon. :-) > > > > > > > > > > Red Hat never shipped official openssh packages for 6.2... > > > > > > > > OpenSSH 3.1 also requires OpenSSL 0.9.6 or newer to build, which we > > > > haven't backported to 6.2. I'm sure this isn't going to be pretty. > > > > > > I'm curious whether how this would not be pretty: just issue > > > openssl-0.9.6[bc] as an update with new library version number, and > > > release openssl095a package like how it's done with RHL7x. > > > > Since we don't support openssh on that platform, there isn't any > > reason for us to do so. > > Then you wouldn't need to backport openssl fixes from "mainstream" to > 0.9.5a. RHL 7 shipped with openssl 0.9.5a (since updated to 0.9.6). Openssh on RHL 6.2 is not supported in any way, but it's nice to have the RPMs working there. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc.
