Hi, I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14. Thanks -- Gustavo [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp On 4/20/21 15:23, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi all, > > Friendly ping: who can take this, please? > > Thanks > -- > Gustavo > > On 11/20/20 12:32, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning >> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall >> through to the next case. >> >> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c >> index 1594687582f0..90bb49bfdba0 100644 >> --- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c >> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c >> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ int search_by_entry_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, >> return IO_ERROR; >> } >> PATH_LAST_POSITION(path)--; >> + break; >> >> case ITEM_FOUND: >> break; >>
