Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 11/20/20 12:32, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/reiserfs/namei.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c > index 1594687582f0..90bb49bfdba0 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/namei.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/namei.c > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ int search_by_entry_key(struct super_block *sb, const struct cpu_key *key, > return IO_ERROR; > } > PATH_LAST_POSITION(path)--; > + break; > > case ITEM_FOUND: > break; >
