On 2018-04-11 13:03, Jan Kara wrote: > OK, I understand now. So basically ripping out all the smarts (except for > buffer space handling) out of reiserfs_warning() and putting them into the > caller. That certainly works although it's quite some work - 175 warnings to > go through. Yes, but it's mostly automated, with gcc providing sanity checks of the end result, and patch 4/4 in this series alone is fs/reiserfs/prints.c | 158 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) adding lots of fragile and complex code that we don't even know actually fixes the problems... I certainly know which I'd prefer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
