On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Ivan Shapovalov <intelfx100@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2015-09-17 at 05:10 -0700, Jose R R wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Ivan Shapovalov < >> intelfx100@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On 2015-09-13 at 05:57 -0700, Jose R R wrote: >> > > Here is some additional info: >> > > >> > > A while back, I installed Debian Jessie AMD64 into a KVM virtual >> > > machine and also included the initial non-systemd boot argument: >> > > preseed/late_command="in-target apt-get install -y sysvinit-core" >> > > < https://wiki.debian.org/systemd#Installing_without_systemd > >> > > >> > > Afterwards a previous reiser4-patched Linux kernel 4.0.x was >> > > installed >> > > into the virtual machine and its root fs was subsequently >> > > formatted >> > > to >> > > reiser4.. The virtual machine was working fine: >> > > < https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKIKgoZUAAIFx12.png:large > >> > > >> > > Yesterday, I installed into the vm a newer 4.1.6 kernel built >> > > "the >> > > debian way" except that it was customized with the newer 4.0.1 >> > > Reiser4 >> > > patch. Upon rebooting the VM, I captured a sequence of 4 >> > > snapshots >> > > (by >> > > paging down) that basically recreate the fail that I experienced >> > > priorly in the physical machine: >> > > >> > > < https://metztli.it/blog/index.php/ixiptli/non-systemd-debian-si >> > > d-re >> > > iser4 > >> > > >> > > Accordingly, seems the *lack of systemd* is enough for a Debian >> > > Sid >> > > instance to create a bad initrd.img. I have no idea if issue only >> > > appears with Reiser4 root fs or if it includes other file systems >> > > as >> > > root. Work in progress... >> > >> > It's presence/absence of crc32c module that matters. Reiser4 does >> > not >> > specify that it needs one. >> > >> Applied your 3 patches >> 1/3 < http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=144218573602435&w=2 > >> 2/3 < http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=144218573602436&w=2 > >> 3/3 < http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=144218573702437&w=2 > >> >> into kernel.org Linux Kernel 4.1.7, but Non-systemd Debian still >> boots >> into an emergency shell >> [...] >> mount: mounting /dev/sdaX on /root failed: no such file or directory >> Target fileystem doesn't have requested /sbin/init >> mount: mounting /dev on /root/dev failed: no such file or directory >> No init found. Try passing init= bootarg. >> [...] > > Correct; it's now a "cleanly" reported error instead of an oops. > You will have to manually add crc32c or crc32c_intel module to the > initramfs, though. I could not find a way to express an explicit > intermodule dependency in the code (to make module reiser4 depend on > module crc32c). > > Edward's patch selects module crc32c when reiser4 is selected in the > build config, but it does not make sure that crc32c will end up in the > initramfs if reiser4 is there (that is, modules.dep will not be > altered). I'm still wondering how to do that properly. > I applied Ed's patch, as well < http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=144250028326153&w=2 > but the non-systemd Debian instance continued to generate a bad initrd.img-. Notwithstanding, based on your suggestions, Ivan, the solution that works for non-systemd system is to include module directive crc32c_intel right *before* module reiser4 directive in debian's /etc/initramfs-tools/modules file, thus: [...] crc32c_intel reiser4 [...] and those modules will be included during initramfs-tools creation of initrd.img-<version> file. Thus, for a new Reiser4(4.0.1)-patched kernel image created "the debian way", having an initrd image like: initrd.img-4.1.0-2-amd64, update-initramfs -dk 4.1.0-2-amd64 # Removes (-d) an existing version (-k) initramfs update-initramfs -ck 4.1.0-2-amd64 # Creates (-c) a new version (-k) initramfs Thus, the non-systemd Debian will generate a proper initrd.img-<version> which will contain *both* sequenced modules *and* will be able to successfully boot the sysvinit-based system. I have been running a small PoC non-systemd Debian Jessie, with Reiser4-patched Linux kernel, on Google Compute Engine (GCE) infrastructure for over two months now[1]. < https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CPWcGMQVEAElVdi.png:large > And I was concerned about its survival if this issue persisted. Thank you all. Best Professional Regards. [1]< http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=143237396102328&w=2 > -- Jose R R http://metztli.it --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html