Re: The reiser4 programming style is recursive?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 10-Dec-08, at 5:07 PM, Ralph Ulrich wrote:

Teran McKinney schrieb:
Of course, D would be a great choice, but C# may be better. I hear
that Torvalds really wants to see more Mono drivers in the kernel.
What else would we do with our 4GB RAM machines?
There is even a Ms project for that :-)

No seriously, nothing in the kernel is coded in anything but C or
assembler. You might as well just make the C code a little more
pretty.
But you know that D is meant for drivers - as a C++ replacement!?

Define 'driver'!

C++ has nothing to do with the Linux kernel (and nor does D). The kernel and its subsystems will continue to be written in C for the fore-C-able future.



You didn' answer my main question:
Is it true that the programming style of reiser4 is recursive style and
that this kind of style was rejected from the kernel developers?

As for 'recursion', it is nothing to be afraid of. Except the kind that blows stacks. ;-)

--Toby


Greeting from rainy Hamburg,
Ralph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs- devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux