Anders Aagaard wrote: > Alexander Lyamin wrote: >> Why one have to worry about cleanness of a _journaled_ fs ? >> Its seems like immediate return on -a is intended behavior. > > I suspect it is, I'm just making sure I have something to fire back > with when a gentoo developer complains about my patch here: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237393 Would you please maintain this issue in Gentoo? I was sure that reiser4 is not checked after every incorrect umount, whereas people shrink their root partitions, format them with other file systems, etc.. and this is sad. Thanks, Edward. >> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Anders Aagaard <aagaande@xxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:aagaande@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> What's the correct options to pass to reiser4.fsck on boot to get it >> to check the filesystem when it's not marked as clean? >> >> reiser4 fsck does implement -a, but it seems to return right away, >> including when the filesystem wasn't unmounted cleanly. Is the >> filesystem integrity still secured by hash'es, so skipping fsck is >> intentional? >> --check --fix seems a tad bit excessive on every boot. >> >> Anders Aagaard >> >> >> >> -- >> connecting the dots > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > reiserfs-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
