Alexander Lyamin wrote:
I dont really like both: idea and flag name.
Can you elaborate a bit on your reasoning behind the patch ?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/195988
Currently closed as RESOLVED_FIXED with preen aliased to --check --fix
more or less. It's not something I expect will be included upstream
anytime soon, but if the gentoo developers refuse to support reiser4 in
init scripts it has to be supported elsewhere. And they default to -p
on linux systems.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Anders Aagaard <aagaande@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:aagaande@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Alexander Lyamin wrote:
Why one have to worry about cleanness of a _journaled_ fs ?
Its seems like immediate return on -a is intended behavior.
I suspect it is, I'm just making sure I have something to fire back
with when a gentoo developer complains about my patch here:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237393
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Anders Aagaard
<aagaande@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:aagaande@xxxxxxxxx>
<mailto:aagaande@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:aagaande@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
Hi
What's the correct options to pass to reiser4.fsck on boot to
get it
to check the filesystem when it's not marked as clean?
reiser4 fsck does implement -a, but it seems to return right
away,
including when the filesystem wasn't unmounted cleanly. Is the
filesystem integrity still secured by hash'es, so skipping
fsck is
intentional?
--check --fix seems a tad bit excessive on every boot.
Anders Aagaard
--
connecting the dots
--
connecting the dots
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
