Hello
Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> This is the second in a set of 4 patches that split balance_leaf up into
> a group of functions rather than the 2500 beast it once was.
>
> This patch splits off the right-tree balancing behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c | 671 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 290 insertions(+), 381 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c 2007-05-30 17:54:43.000000000 -0400
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/do_balan.c 2007-05-30 17:55:02.000000000 -0400
> @@ -587,6 +587,293 @@ balance_leaf_left(struct tree_balance *t
> pos_in_item);
> }
>
> +static void
> +balance_leaf_right_insert(struct tree_balance *tb, struct item_head *ih,
> + const char *body, int flag, int *zeros_num,
> + int item_pos)
> +{
[snip]
> +
> +static void
> +bl_right_paste_de_partial(struct tree_balance *tb, struct item_head *ih,
> + const char *body, int flag, int *zeros_num,
> + int item_pos, int *pos_in_item)
> +{
shouldn't function name prefixes be more consistent? Either bl_ or
balance_leaf everywhere?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
