Re: Compiling Kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/14/2010 11:07 AM, Masoom Siddiqui wrote:
Hi,

Did anyone ever had the need to compile kernel for specific reasons? I'd
like to know of possible scenarios where a company requires something
specific. I'm guessing this would be beyond web and email hosting.
There are a few scenarios where this is done. If you need a specific patch due to security issues or added functionality ( fye GRSEC). Or if you need to remove or add features from the kernel (there are a million options in the kernel, some needed and not needed for various implementations) Or if you want to just have the latest stable kernel. On 32 bit systems, a recompile can be needed for hugemem support. The last time I recompiled my kernel, it was due to a specific bug that affected the kernel I was running. I didn't want to roll back though due to secuity implications, so I compiled the latest stable kernel. Keep in mind though, in the RedHat world if you recompile your kernel I believe the OS is unsupported until you are using a stock kernel, so use it only when necessary.

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux