[...] >>> >>> Ok, that's nothing I would have expected, from my limited experience with VMs. >>> VMware, you install the "guest" o/s in the VM, and it doesn't have to know >>> anything about the VM host. >> >> Xen guest paravirtualization, i.e., when the guest or DomU "knows" >> that it is being virtualized, provides the closest to native hardware >> performance. Accordingly, open --hence modifiable or capable of being >> "Xenizied"-- kernels like that of GNU/Linux are the ideal for the >> so-called cloud computing platform or delivery mechanism. >> >> The performance of Software as a Service (SaaS) applications, being >> served/delivered through the cloud platform, is dependent on the >> qualities of underlying infrastructure, of which virtualization plays >> a prominent role. Neither proprietary, closed source, technologies as >> those by VmWare or MS HyperV, can provide the level of flexibility >> and/or performance as that enabled by open source Xen technology. >> >> Additionally, interoperability and deployment of virtual machines >> hosting business applications among the different cloud computing >> providers, including those of private clouds, decreases significantly >> if closed source, self-serving proprietary virtualization enabler >> infrastructure technology prevail. >> > On the other hand, given ESGLinux's problems, *requiring* knowledge of the host > o/s can result in more problems. It also seems to me that that same knowledge > would provide hooks for intrusion into the host o/s. This issue has been addressed at length --please, search relevant keywords. The fact that proprietary technologies like VmWare do not disclose in the open their security issues does not leave them out of similar security issues. > > For that matter, the whole concept of an o/s, as I was taught it, lo, these > many years ago, was that the programs running on it did *not* have to have > knowledge of the hardware, but made standardized calls to the API's of the o/s, > which provided the services required. > That was when x86 technology was still a "creature." Now, in spite of its obvious limitations, it wants to "grow" and emulate an feature of the mainframe. > Then there's another issue, that being that I am *very* unconvinced of the > wonderfulness of cloud computing. If it were being offered via an intranet, to > use spare resources inside an organization, that's one thing (I'm thinking of > something along an expanded version of Seti-at-home); but as soon as it's out > of my control, the guaranty of both data security and availiblity becomes > questionable. > Current economic conditions are dragging conservative attitudes into outsourcing their IT plumbing and cloud computing does exactly that. The proliferation of cloud computing platform delivery mechanism providers, of which Amazon EC2 is the poster child, should start smashing those artificial attitudes. -- Jose R R http://www.metztli-it.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IBM Lotus Symphony supported on GNU/Linux, Mac OS, and Windows. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Daylight Saving Time in USA & Canada starts: Sunday 08 March 2009 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
