hiii,
i have no enough knowledge about MS OS...but i think Group Policys
in MS,UAC (User Access Control) are only for user or group based security.i
can`t handle daemon based security.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Anton Hofmann
<doomrunner.lists@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> ESGLinux schrieb:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >> (2) Yes SELinux involves MORE work, but it keep your system safe
> >
> >
> > Yes you are right, MORE work, sometimes I think that if the sealert
> wouldn´t
> > exists it would be imposible to configure SELinux at all,
> >
> > thanks for that tool !!!
>
> For some software-packages you´ll also find special selinux-policies
> e.g. oracle-xe-selinux, oracle-instantclient-selinux etc.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFJmsQ4XMoRx2jlGfkRAr7hAJ406ogb0XJX1CsUjr+O47Ei4x76eQCdGOIP
> RFtU0Llh/Q+mjXFkXf+OfFY=
> =H74/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjecthttps://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
