Anton Hofmann wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Joy Methew schrieb:
hello all,
Redhat gives Selinux security.....does microsoft provide
this type security??
bcoz selinux is very important and robust security.....
Thanks
There is no technology like SElinux for MS-Operatingsystems, you can use
Group Policys in Server 2008 to "secure" object access, but that is a
big difference compared to SElinux.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFJmXvxXMoRx2jlGfkRAuhnAKC8fqLC8FXn2fPHf6mrD7JzuwWqYgCgt+Qg
kAZ3eQFeSU2Om6Li4cLzWgI=
=1QTW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I would think the better question is :
Why are you still running Windows?
And no SELinux is not even generally accepted in the Linux world as a
standard
so how/why would other platforms care?
I tend to keep SELinux on, but it does create some extra work
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
