Hello Joy, when NSA started researching for a better security model and invented SELinux, they picked Linux kernel to implement it, as it is open source. I don't know much about Group Policys in MS win os, but I am quite sure that they are not the same. At the same time I want to ask you the same question as *Tosh* did. regards, Ahmed Sharif On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Tosh <toshlinux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Anton Hofmann wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Joy Methew schrieb: >> >>> hello all, >>> Redhat gives Selinux security.....does microsoft >>> provide >>> this type security?? >>> bcoz selinux is very important and robust security..... >>> >>> Thanks >>> >> >> There is no technology like SElinux for MS-Operatingsystems, you can use >> Group Policys in Server 2008 to "secure" object access, but that is a >> big difference compared to SElinux. >> >> I would think the better question is : > Why are you still running Windows? > > And no SELinux is not even generally accepted in the Linux world as a > standard > so how/why would other platforms care? > I tend to keep SELinux on, but it does create some extra work > > > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
