Did you assign 192.168.2.212 to eth0. Clear the ARP cache on your switch/server. Then try again. -Jai -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ugo Bellavance Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 11:15 AM To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: Traffic going to eth1 is goin Hi, I'm scratching my head on this one... I've configured a server with 2 network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. eth0 = 192.168.2.211 and eth1 = 192.168.2.212. eth1 seemed to work properly, but whenever I open a connection to 192.168.2.212, I see the traffic on eth0. Digging deeper led me to this finding. When there is an arp who-has 192.168.2.212, the arp reply contains the MAC address of eth0 instead of eth1. Both ports are connected to a Cisco Catalyst switch. Any idea of how this could happen and the solution? The only cause that I can think of is that at the beginning, I tried configuring bonding on this server, so both interfaces seemed to have the same MAC address, but I configured this bonded interface with only one IP address anyway, and I think it was in another subnet. Any idea welcome. Thanks, Ugo -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
