Hi,
I'm scratching my head on this one...
I've configured a server with 2 network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. eth0
= 192.168.2.211 and eth1 = 192.168.2.212. eth1 seemed to work properly,
but whenever I open a connection to 192.168.2.212, I see the traffic on
eth0.
Digging deeper led me to this finding. When there is an arp who-has
192.168.2.212, the arp reply contains the MAC address of eth0 instead of
eth1.
Both ports are connected to a Cisco Catalyst switch.
Any idea of how this could happen and the solution? The only cause that
I can think of is that at the beginning, I tried configuring bonding on
this server, so both interfaces seemed to have the same MAC address, but
I configured this bonded interface with only one IP address anyway,
and I think it was in another subnet.
Any idea welcome.
Thanks,
Ugo
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list