help 2008/6/13 <redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to > redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. sending mail w/o sendmail service (steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > 2. Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service (Andrew Bacchi) > 3. Failing updates (Margaret Doll) > 4. Windows and RH (Margaret Doll) > 5. Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service (steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > 6. RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service (Geofrey Rainey) > 7. Re: Red Hat 5 Enterprise Server 5 question (Pat Riehecky) > 8. Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected (Pat Riehecky) > 9. Re: Windows and RH (Pat Riehecky) > 10. Re: Windows and RH (Margaret Doll) > 11. Re: Windows and RH (hike) > 12. Re: Windows and RH (Marcos Trazzini) > 13. Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? (Scott R. Ehrlich) > 14. Re: Failing updates (Marcos Trazzini) > 15. Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? (fwd) (Scott R. Ehrlich) > 16. Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected (sunhux G) > 17. Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected (sunhux G) > 18. *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > (Bhat, Ajit) > 19. Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS (Michael Schwendt) > 20. RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS (Bhat, Ajit) > 21. Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS (Michael Schwendt) > 22. RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS (Bhat, Ajit) > 23. RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS (Bhat, Ajit) > 24. Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS (Michael Schwendt) > 25. Re: Failing updates (Margaret Doll) > 26. RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service (steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:55:45 -0400 > Subject: sending mail w/o sendmail service > I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an > internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and > changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record) > server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the > RH7.2 servers. > > I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck. > All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v > XXX@xxxxxxx) = > XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... > XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully > goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas. > > Thanks - Steve > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Andrew Bacchi <bacchi@xxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:09:57 -0400 > Subject: Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service > It may be firewall related. I have this line in my /etc/sysconfig/iptables file to allow localhost > > # Allow localhost full access. > -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT > > Add it and restart the firewall. HTH. > > steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an >> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and >> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record) >> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the >> RH7.2 servers. >> >> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck. >> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v >> XXX@xxxxxxx) = >> XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... >> XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] >> >> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully >> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas. >> >> Thanks - Steve >> >> > > -- > veritatas simplex oratio est > -Seneca > > Andrew Bacchi > Systems Programmer > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809 > > http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/ > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll@xxxxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:20:54 -0400 > Subject: Failing updates > I have eleven systems running RedHat. Nine of them use up2date; I am having no problems with them. > > Two of them don't have up2date; I use "yum update" on them. These two systems are running > > 2.6.18-92.el5 > 2.6.18-53.el5xen (with a reboot, this system will be at the same level as the above system) > > I am having problems with xen-libraries > > more update-prob > yum update > Loading "rhnplugin" plugin > rhel-i386-server-5 100% |=========================| 1.4 kB 00:00 > Setting up Update Process > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package xen-libs.i386 0:3.0.3-64.el5_2.1 set to be updated > ---> Package libhugetlbfs.i386 0:1.2-5.el5 set to be updated > --> Processing Dependency: xen-libs = 3.0.3-41.el5_1.5 for package: xen > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Missing Dependency: xen-libs = 3.0.3-41.el5_1.5 is needed by packag > e xen > > > and with libhugetlbfs > > yum update libhugetlbfs > Loading "security" plugin > Loading "rhnplugin" plugin > rhel-x86_64-server-5 100% |=========================| 1.4 kB 00:00 > Skipping security plugin, no data > Setting up Update Process > Resolving Dependencies > Skipping security plugin, no data > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package libhugetlbfs.x86_64 0:1.2-5.el5 set to be updated > --> Processing Conflict: libhugetlbfs conflicts libhugetlbfs-lib < 1.2 > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: libhugetlbfs conflicts with libhugetlbfs-lib < 1.2 > > Is there a way to fix the problem? > > Thanks > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Margaret Doll <margaret_doll@xxxxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:22:50 -0400 > Subject: Windows and RH > I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on the "new" first disk. > > How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible without re-installing RedHat? > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:24:26 -0400 > Subject: Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service > No firewall running. I can manually send things to port 25 without an > issue. Thanks for thinking about it.... > > > > > > Andrew Bacchi > <bacchi@xxxxxxx> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Sent by: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > redhat-list-bounces cc: (bcc: Steve Stamper/FST/Farmers/USA/Zurich) > @redhat.com Subject: Re: sending mail w/o sendmail service > > > 06/12/2008 01:09 PM > Please respond to > General Red Hat > Linux discussion > list > > > > > > It may be firewall related. I have this line in my > /etc/sysconfig/iptables file to allow localhost > > # Allow localhost full access. > -A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1/32 -d 0/0 -j ACCEPT > > Add it and restart the firewall. HTH. > > steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an >> internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and >> changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record) >> server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the >> RH7.2 servers. >> >> I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck. >> All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v >> XXX@xxxxxxx) = >> XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... >> XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] >> >> When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully >> goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas. >> >> Thanks - Steve >> >> > > -- > veritatas simplex oratio est > -Seneca > > Andrew Bacchi > Systems Programmer > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809 > > http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/ > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Geofrey Rainey" <Geofrey.Rainey@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 05:29:34 +1200 > Subject: RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service > Try editing and adding that line to the file "submit.cf", not > "sendmail.cf". > > Regards, > > Geofrey Rainey > Systems Engineer > D. 64 9 916 7178 > M. 64 21 563 106 > geofrey.rainey@xxxxxxxxxx > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, 13 June 2008 4:56 a.m. > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: sending mail w/o sendmail service > > I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an > internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and > changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record) > server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the > RH7.2 servers. > > I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck. > All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v > XXX@xxxxxxx) = > XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... > XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully > goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas. > > Thanks - Steve > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ========================================================== > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us > online at tvnz.co.nz > ========================================================== > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This information > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation. > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck@xxxxxxx> > To: wheakory@xxxxxxx, General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:59:49 -0500 > Subject: Re: Red Hat 5 Enterprise Server 5 question > I have RHEL5 running on several systems here with perfect uptime. My > original RHEL5 box (updated through 1 and through 2) has had a recorded > downtime of 2 hours in the last 18 months. > > I would heartily recommend it over RHEL4 > Pat > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:19 -0600, Kory Wheatley wrote: >> Just a general question. Do you think that Red Hat 5 Enterprise Server >> OS is stable to install on a production syste? Currently all our >> systems are still using RHE 4. I have a new system that's going into >> production and I wanted to install RHE 5 on it. Anything I need to know >> or worry about? >> -- >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck@xxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:01:59 -0500 > Subject: Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected > insert it and type dmesg that will give you an insight into what the > system is working on. It may be as simple as having the auto media > stuff off or it may be more complex. In either case dmesg will tell you > what the kernel sees, from there making userspace behave is simpler. > > Pat > > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:34 +0800, sunhux G wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On our RHES 4.6, when I insert a thumb drive into the USB >> port, it will autodetect & "df -k" will show /.../usbdisk >> >> However, on our RHES 5.1 AP, I can't see it when I inserted >> an external portable 2.5" hard-disk into the USB. >> >> I'm not sure if my colleague has hardened it - if so how do I >> turn in on back? >> >> >> Thanks >> U > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pat Riehecky <prieheck@xxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:04:50 -0500 > Subject: Re: Windows and RH > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:22 -0400, Margaret Doll wrote: >> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They >> then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on >> the "new" first disk. >> >> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible >> without re-installing RedHat? >> > > Here is a good resource, it applies to all linux systems > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot some knowledge of what all is > going on is a prerequisite but google can fill in the blanks for you as > needed.... > > Pat > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll@xxxxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:58:51 -0400 > Subject: Re: Windows and RH > Pat, > > On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:22 -0400, Margaret Doll wrote: >>> >>> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They >>> then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on >>> the "new" first disk. >>> >>> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible >>> without re-installing RedHat? >>> >> >> Here is a good resource, it applies to all linux systems >> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot some knowledge of what all is >> going on is a prerequisite but google can fill in the blanks for you as >> needed.... >> > > The instructions say to install Windows first. The problem is that the user > installed RedHat first and then Windows. > > >> Pat >> >> -- >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: hike <mh1272@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:30:22 -0400 > Subject: Re: Windows and RH > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> Pat, >> >> On Jun 12, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 13:22 -0400, Margaret Doll wrote: >>> >>>> I have a user who installed RH on the first disk in a system. They >>>> then switch the first and second disk. Windows was then installed on >>>> the "new" first disk. >>>> >>>> How do I fix the boot sequence so that both systems are accessible >>>> without re-installing RedHat? >>>> >>>> >>> Here is a good resource, it applies to all linux systems >>> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Dual_boot some knowledge of what all is >>> going on is a prerequisite but google can fill in the blanks for you as >>> needed.... >>> >>> >> The instructions say to install Windows first. The problem is that the >> user >> installed RedHat first and then Windows. >> >> >> >> Pat >>> >>> -- >>> redhat-list mailing list >>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >>> >> >> -- >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > This is not a big problem. > There are instructions on the web (I have seen them. google "windows linux > dual boot", etc.). You can boot Linux from the Windows boot loader and you > can boot Windows from Grub. (You can even use Grub to boot just > Windows--that is, no Linux partition at all but that isn't your situation.) > > Grub and the Windows boot-loader both reside in the MBR (master boot record) > so either will do. > > You can even load Grub over the Windows boot-loader after the fact. It just > it is easier to load Windows first and then load Linux. > > > Another topic, have you taken the time to berate and belittle your end > user. > All work and no play makes an admin a dull admin. > The BOFH has plenty of suggestions, too! > LOL! > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Marcos Trazzini" <mstrazzini@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:48:08 -0300 > Subject: Re: Windows and RH > I guess that if you change the boot disk to the second disk (Red Hat > Linux) and put the following grub boot entry (on /boot/grub/menu.lst) > should fix the problem: > > ---- CUT HERE ---- > > title Windows > root (hd0,0) > savedefault > makeactive > chainloader +1 > > ---- CUT HERE ---- > > Rgds > > -- > Marcos S. Trazzini => mstrazzini@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Scott R. Ehrlich" <scott@xxxxxxx> > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:58:36 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? > Hello to all: > > I am very interested in FW Depot's - http://fwdepot.com) eRAID 5 system for a relatively inexpensive (vs 4k or more) external, self-contained RAID 5 system as a hard drive backup solution. > > I am first wondering people's thoughts/experiences with this company? > How are they with support and customer feedback? What is the quality of their products? How well do their products, or, in this case, their eRAID 5, interface with a CentOS 5 machine? > > I sent them a question via their web interface yesterday, then when I got no response today, I emailed them this morning, and still no response. > Doesn't make me feel very optimistic of their [potential] customer interaction. No phone number on their Contact Us sight doesn't help either. > > Are there any other similar RAID 5 devices from other places that have good customer feedback and whose products are well-liked and work well? > > Thanks for any insight/feedback. > > Scott > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Marcos Trazzini" <mstrazzini@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:44:21 -0300 > Subject: Re: Failing updates > Humm.. Have you (or someone) checked the "Virtualization" box on the > software profile selection during the installation of these RHEL5 > servers? > > Anyway, the server must be subscribed to "RHEL Virtualization" software channel. > > -- > Marcos S. Trazzini => mstrazzini@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Scott R. Ehrlich" <scott@xxxxxxx> > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:24:52 -0400 (EDT) > Subject: Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? (fwd) > Let's modify the request to also include reputable companies offering a > similar type of device with a starting price of $3000. > > Thanks. > > Scott > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:58:36 -0400 (EDT) > From: Scott R. Ehrlich <scott@xxxxxxx> > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Firewire Depot and eRAID 5? > > Hello to all: > > I am very interested in FW Depot's - http://fwdepot.com) eRAID 5 system for a relatively inexpensive (vs 4k or more) external, self-contained RAID 5 system as a hard drive backup solution. > > I am first wondering people's thoughts/experiences with this company? > How are they with support and customer feedback? What is the quality of their products? How well do their products, or, in this case, their eRAID 5, interface with a CentOS 5 machine? > > I sent them a question via their web interface yesterday, then when I got no response today, I emailed them this morning, and still no response. > Doesn't make me feel very optimistic of their [potential] customer interaction. No phone number on their Contact Us sight doesn't help either. > > Are there any other similar RAID 5 devices from other places that have good customer feedback and whose products are well-liked and work well? > > Thanks for any insight/feedback. > > Scott > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "sunhux G" <sunhux@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:47:49 +0800 > Subject: Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected > Hi, > > "dmesg" has this : > > usb 5-8: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and addr 7 > usb 5-8: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > scsi6 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass storage devices > Vendor: WDC WD25 Model ... > Type: Direct-Access > SCSI device sdj: ... 250059MB (Yes, this USB disk is 250Gb) > sdj: Write protect is off > sdj: sdjl > > Time stamp of > /dev/sdj & > /dev/usb5.7_ep00 _ep01 _ep82 > showed these device files have just been created > > Tried : > mount -t usbfs /dev/sdj /mnt > but saw a few weird files in /mnt & not the files I'm > expecting to see. > > "-t msdos", "-t autofs", "-t hfs" won't mount. > So what should I do next as "df -k" still not showing > usb partitions mounted. > > > On 6/13/08, Pat Riehecky <prieheck@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> insert it and type dmesg that will give you an insight into what the >> system is working on. It may be as simple as having the auto media >> stuff off or it may be more complex. In either case dmesg will tell you >> what the kernel sees, from there making userspace behave is simpler. >> >> Pat >> >> On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:34 +0800, sunhux G wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On our RHES 4.6, when I insert a thumb drive into the USB >> > port, it will autodetect & "df -k" will show /.../usbdisk >> > >> > However, on our RHES 5.1 AP, I can't see it when I inserted >> > an external portable 2.5" hard-disk into the USB. >> > >> > I'm not sure if my colleague has hardened it - if so how do I >> > turn in on back? >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > U >> >> -- >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "sunhux G" <sunhux@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:56:22 +0800 > Subject: Re: USB devices on RHES 5.1 not detected > Hi, > > Just to add a little info on what I've seen in /var/log/messages > when a thumb drive is inserted : > > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: SCSI device sdj: 999424 512 byte (512Mb) - > yes, my thumb > drive is 512Mb > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: sdj: write protect is off > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: assuming drive cache write through > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: sdj: sdl > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: attached SCSI removable disk sdj > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: attached SCSI sg13 type 0 > > <<< now I pull out the thumb drive & next message appeared in messages >>> > June 13 17:23 slalnx13 kernel: usb 5-8: USB disconnected, address 10 > > > When I did "mount -t usbfs /dev/sdj /usb", > found under /usb, following files/folders though > my thumb drive is supposed to contain other files : > 001 > 002 > ... > 005 > devices > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:15 +0100 > Subject: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > Hi - > > We are getting core dumps at exit on Linux 4 AS, Same application runs > successfully on Linux 4 ES > > The error we receive on Linux 4 AS is - > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) > > Following link discusses work around > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/e...-notes/as-x86/ > > wondering if this is a bug in glibc. How do we resolve this? Is it by > upgrading glibc? > > Thanks in Advance > > - Ajit > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:04:24 +0200 > Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:15 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> We are getting core dumps at exit on Linux 4 AS, Same application runs >> successfully on Linux 4 ES >> >> The error we receive on Linux 4 AS is - >> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) >> >> Following link discusses work around >> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/e...-notes/as-x86/ >> >> wondering if this is a bug in glibc. How do we resolve this? Is it by >> upgrading glibc? > > It is much more likely a bug in the application. > Show the stacktrace. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100 > Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES? > > Stack trace is - > > #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > (gdb) where > #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from > /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 > #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start () > > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/release-note > s/as-x86/ > > > - Ajit > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt > Sent: 13 June 2008 12:04 > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:57:15 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote: > >> Hi - >> >> We are getting core dumps at exit on Linux 4 AS, Same application runs >> successfully on Linux 4 ES >> >> The error we receive on Linux 4 AS is - >> *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) >> >> Following link discusses work around >> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/e...-notes/as-x86/ >> >> wondering if this is a bug in glibc. How do we resolve this? Is it by >> upgrading glibc? > > It is much more likely a bug in the application. > Show the stacktrace. > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:22:13 +0200 > Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote: > >> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES? > > Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack > usage, other run-time side-effects. > > Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations? > > Same version of glibc? If not, why not? > > And in either case, which version of glibc is it? > >> Stack trace is - >> >> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from >> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start () > > Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to? > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:29:00 +0100 > Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > Thanks - > > Architecture on both machine is exact same, but are differences in glibc > version > > rpm -q -a | grep glibc > > On failing machine - > > glibc-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.98.EL > glibc-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25 > compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30 > glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-common-2.3.4-2.25 > compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30 > glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-profile-2.3.4-2.25 > compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30 > > On passing machine - > > glibc-2.3.4-2 > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2 > glibc-2.3.4-2 > glibc-headers-2.3.4-2 > glibc-common-2.3.4-2 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2 > > > I am not sure why they are not same, but will that make difference? > Also, that's the only stack trace we get which is not much informative. > > - Ajit > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt > Sent: 13 June 2008 12:22 > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote: > >> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES? > > Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack > usage, other run-time side-effects. > > Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations? > > Same version of glibc? If not, why not? > > And in either case, which version of glibc is it? > >> Stack trace is - >> >> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from >> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from > /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start () > > Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to? > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Bhat, Ajit" <abhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:32:35 +0100 > Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > Hi - > > We always build our product on passing machine which is Linux 4 ES and > same code now testing on Linux 4 AS. Glibc and gcc version are different > on failing machine. > > - Ajit > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bhat, Ajit > Sent: 13 June 2008 12:29 > To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > Subject: RE: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS > > Thanks - > > Architecture on both machine is exact same, but are differences in glibc > version > > rpm -q -a | grep glibc > > On failing machine - > > glibc-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.98.EL > glibc-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.25 > compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30 > glibc-utils-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-common-2.3.4-2.25 > compat-glibc-headers-2.3.2-95.30 > glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.25 > glibc-profile-2.3.4-2.25 > compat-glibc-2.3.2-95.30 > > On passing machine - > > glibc-2.3.4-2 > glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.87 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2 > glibc-2.3.4-2 > glibc-headers-2.3.4-2 > glibc-common-2.3.4-2 > glibc-devel-2.3.4-2 > > > I am not sure why they are not same, but will that make difference? > Also, that's the only stack trace we get which is not much informative. > > - Ajit > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Schwendt > Sent: 13 June 2008 12:22 > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 > AS > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:09:04 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote: > >> Thanks but same application runs on Linux 4 ES? > > Memory deallocation corruption can depend on memory usage, stack > usage, other run-time side-effects. > > Is it the same architecture (x86_64) on both installations? > > Same version of glibc? If not, why not? > > And in either case, which version of glibc is it? > >> Stack trace is - >> >> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x0000003468f2e21d in raise () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #1 0x0000003468f2fa1e in abort () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #2 0x0000003468f63291 in __libc_message () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #3 0x0000003468f686b2 in malloc_consolidate () from >> /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #4 0x0000003468f68c3a in _int_free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #5 0x0000003468f691f6 in free () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #6 0x0000003468f30c69 in exit () from /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #7 0x0000003468f1c402 in __libc_start_main () from > /lib64/tls/libc.so.6 >> #8 0x0000000000584a8a in _start () > > Not sure this is correct. What application do you refer to? > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:47:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption RedHat 4 AS > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 12:29:00 +0100, Bhat, Ajit wrote: > >> Thanks - >> >> Architecture on both machine is exact same, but are differences in glibc >> version >> >> rpm -q -a | grep glibc >> >> On failing machine - >> >> glibc-2.3.4-2.25 > > Not up-to-date either. > >> On passing machine - >> >> glibc-2.3.4-2 > > This machine has not seen any update yet. This original glibc is more > than three years old. There have been several updates since then. > >> I am not sure why they are not same, but will that make difference? > > Be sure to give the latest glibc update a try. It could be that it > includes fixes you need. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Margaret Doll <Margaret_Doll@xxxxxxxxx> > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:01:38 -0400 > Subject: Re: Failing updates > > On Jun 12, 2008, at 5:44 PM, Marcos Trazzini wrote: > >> Humm.. Have you (or someone) checked the "Virtualization" box on the >> software profile selection during the installation of these RHEL5 >> servers? >> >> Anyway, the server must be subscribed to "RHEL Virtualization" software channel. > > I installed one of the system; a user installed the other. > > I don't remember anything about an RHEL Virtualization software channel as I was > doing the installation. >> >> >> -- >> Marcos S. Trazzini => mstrazzini@xxxxxxxxx >> >> -- >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:47:10 -0400 > Subject: RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service > Hurray!! Issued Resolved!!! Geofrey - your my hero! > > > > > > > "Geofrey Rainey" > <Geofrey.Rainey@tvn To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" > z.co.nz> <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent by: cc: (bcc: Steve Stamper/FST/Farmers/USA/Zurich) > redhat-list-bounces Subject: RE: sending mail w/o sendmail service > @redhat.com > > > 06/12/2008 01:29 PM > Please respond to > General Red Hat > Linux discussion > list > > > > > > Try editing and adding that line to the file "submit.cf", not > "sendmail.cf". > > Regards, > > Geofrey Rainey > Systems Engineer > D. 64 9 916 7178 > M. 64 21 563 106 > geofrey.rainey@xxxxxxxxxx > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > steve.stamper@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Friday, 13 June 2008 4:56 a.m. > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: sending mail w/o sendmail service > > I have several systems running RH7.2 that can send mail just fine to an > internal corporate mail relay. I simply edited the sendmail.cf file and > changed the DS directive to point to this specific (non MX record) > server. The sendmail service is not running (corporate standard) on the > RH7.2 servers. > > I'm now trying to do the same thing on RHEL3 and am not having any luck. > All mail is being directed back to the loopback address (mail -v > XXX@xxxxxxx) = > XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... > XXX@xxxxxxxxxx Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > When I telnet to the mail relay on port 25 the manual mail successfully > goes through. Stumped... Looking for some ideas. > > Thanks - Steve > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > ========================================================== > For more information on the Television New Zealand Group, visit us > online at tvnz.co.nz > ========================================================== > CAUTION: This e-mail and any attachment(s) contain information that > is intended to be read only by the named recipient(s). This information > is not to be used or stored by any other person and/or organisation. > > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > __ > redhat-list mailing list > Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
