On 10/03/2008, Rodrick Brown <rbrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > tar cvfp - . | ssh -c blowfish remote '(cd /storage/archive; tar xvf - )' > > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto: > redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mad Unix > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 9:29 AM > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: rsync or rdist > > any one have acript to do the remote transfer ... > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Herta Van den Eynde < > herta.vandeneynde@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/03/2008, Mad Unix <madunix@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I need a script transfer archive log files from Production site > > > Server1 to DR site Server2 on the same subnet > > > i want to sync the files between /arc with /storage/archive on both > > > servers .... > > > > > > -- > > > madunix > > > > > > AFAIK, rdist copies entire files. rsync only copies the blocks that are > > different. > > > > Note also that you can run rsync through ssh for a more secure transfer. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Herta > > > > -- > > "Life on Earth may be expensive, > > but it comes with a free ride around the Sun." > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > > > -- > madunix > -- > Looks like a complicated way to do what a simple 'scp -pr source target' will accomplish. Or am I missing something? Rodrick does have a point, though: if you simply want to copy new files from server A to server B, a simple copy will be faster than rsync, as you don't need the comparison phase. But scp will be faster than the tar - transfer - untar. Kind regards, Herta -- "Life on Earth may be expensive, but it comes with a free ride around the Sun." -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
