Re: partitioning scheme

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mad Unix wrote:
What you think about this?

/boot ---> local disk

Questionable - see below, but hey - people seem to love partitioning things.

/       ---->  localdisk
swap ------> localdisk

/tmp  ----->  SAN

I'd keep that local, you have enough space - either mount it as a tmpfs system (ala solaris) or just make it part of the root FS, optimally, if you are going for security, make it a seperate partition (tmpfs or local disk) and mount it with the nonexec flags set as well.

(note: tmpfs is basically a ramdisk like filesystem that is virtual and gets wipes at reboot)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TMPFS

/usr  ------> SAN

this is a _really bad_ idea.

A lot of the time, you can get yourself in trouble if you are not exceptionally careful about what is called at boot, and these days a lot of stuff sits off /usr and you could accidentally isolate something that needs to be run to allow - say, the SAN to come online.

Back in the day, people used to partition stuff lots simply because there was no such thing as a large hard drive (ok, this is not 100% correct, but pretty close) - a lot of people claimed it was for data retention incase of a system/drive crash, but seriously, how many people that claim this do you know that have HAD a headcrash on a drive and then tried to reconstruct data from the other segments of the drive - generally when a drive crashes it will take out pretty much all the of device rendering it ALL unusable. (and again, yes, at times you DO try to reconstruct the data but it is NOT a common event and you can cause more problems than you solve with this file system fragmentation that everyone seems dead keen on)

Your best protection is NOT more partitions it is things like RAID (i'd mirror those two local disks) and good backups with a _tested_ restore process.


/home -----> SAN

This seems ok

/opt -----> SAN

Yup

/var -------> SAN

I'd tend to keep this local as well - in particular, as the logs and stuff tend to go there as well as other ancillary things (/var/run and /var/tmp) that are used to bring the system up, it means that in event of SAN failure you can still actually boot the system and have it semi workable.

/u01 -----> SAN

Yup.

--
Steve
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux