What you think about this? /boot ---> local disk / ----> localdisk swap ------> localdisk /tmp -----> SAN /usr ------> SAN /home -----> SAN /opt -----> SAN /var -------> SAN /u01 -----> SAN On 11/4/07, mark <m.roth2006@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Mad Unix wrote: > > which partitioning scheme would you recommend (/boot, /, /tmp, swap, > /u01, > > /home, /opt, /var) for a server 2x73G with 16GRAM attached to SAN > storage. > > am planning to keep most of file systems and live data on the SAN in > case > > any fault on the server I can replace it with onther hardware identical > one. > > I'd offer the article I wrote that came out in the July 07 issue of > SysAdmin, > but the mag gave up the ghost, and its website shows a servlet error.... > > Anyway, I would *STRONGLY* recommend /boot, / and swap be local (though > preferably have swap on its own partition, if not a different drive than > /). > /u01 - using Oracle, are we? These days, it tends to wind up under > /opt/oracle. > Anyway, I'd put the rest there. > > MMmm, come to think of it, I think I'd want /var local, since that > includes > things like the rpm database of packages installed on that machine. > > mark > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- madunix -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
