Hi All, I have a problem with wu-ftpd I cannot upload files that are bigger than 2G I have fc6 Linux. Please help! Tnx Juda UNIX is user friendly; it is just picky who its friends are! -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 6:00 PM To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 23 Send redhat-list mailing list submissions to redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at redhat-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of redhat-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: RAS and LiveCD (dbrett@xxxxxxx) 2. Re: RAS and LiveCD (Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin) 3. Query on NTP (Ravi Shanmugam) 4. Re: Query on NTP (Mridul Dutta) 5. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Sorin Srbu) 6. RE: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 21 (Sorin Srbu) 7. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Johan Booysen) 8. RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S (Sorin Srbu) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:39:06 -0400 (EDT) From: dbrett@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: RAS and LiveCD To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710211337540.23548@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Thanks to Sorin, this message was getting lost due to a server time error. I am resubmitting hoping to get some insite. thanks david On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, dbrett@xxxxxxx wrote: > I was looking at buying a RAS, but could not find one I liked at a price I > could afford. I was deciding to build one from and old computer I had lying > around. The more I looked into it I though I would build a LiveCD to do > this. I found a number of sites which talk about how to build LiveCD, but I > am in need of information on how to build a RAS which windows boxes can > connect too as well. The second thing I need help on is modifying LiveCD. > > thanks > david > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:00:58 +0800 From: "Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin" <mij@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: RAS and LiveCD To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <b3d998b00710212000r75b62d0co41d57f03bc24ba1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 1/7/02, dbrett@xxxxxxx <dbrett@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I was looking at buying a RAS, but could not find one I liked at a price I > could afford. I was deciding to build one from and old computer I had > lying around. The more I looked into it I though I would build a LiveCD > to do this. I found a number of sites which talk about how to build > LiveCD, but I am in need of information on how to build a RAS which > windows boxes can connect too as well. The second thing I need help on is > modifying LiveCD. > What do you mean by RAS? Is it Red Hat Advanced Server? Some good articles on building Live CD, http://www.livecdlist.com/wiki/index.php/LiveCD_Creation_Resources http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7246 -- Regards, Mohd Irwan Jamaluddin Web: http://www.irwan.name/ Blog: http://blog.irwan.name/ ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:49:48 +0530 From: "Ravi Shanmugam" <ravi.shanmugam@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Query on NTP To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <6025AF6D092FBF4B8C4813E924C8D7450C45A5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, I am using a client which has access to 2 different servers with NTP deamon running in them. Can I configure my client to sync the time with these 2 servers like server server1 server server2 What will happen if both the servers have different time? To what time my server will sync? Thanks. Your reply will be very helpful to me. Regds, Ravi R.S SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER ------------------------- This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. In case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must not, directly or indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message and you are requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained in this message shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken Communication Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent and with due authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the spread of viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:57:11 +0530 From: "Mridul Dutta" <i.mridul@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Query on NTP To: "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <a35542d0710212327o14168f5bg247635d0934d1452@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hi , TIme server will sync from Primary server. ex: from server 1 On 10/22/07, Ravi Shanmugam <ravi.shanmugam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using a client which has access to 2 different servers with NTP > deamon running in them. > Can I configure my client to sync the time with these 2 servers like > > server server1 > server server2 > > What will happen if both the servers have different time? To what time > my server will sync? > > Thanks. Your reply will be very helpful to me. > > Regds, > Ravi R.S > > SASKEN BUSINESS DISCLAIMER > ------------------------- > This message may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged > information. In > case you are not the original intended Recipient of the message, you must > not, directly or > indirectly, use, Disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this > message and you are > requested to delete it and inform the sender. Any views expressed in this > message are > those of the individual sender unless otherwise stated. Nothing contained > in this message > shall be construed as an offer or acceptance of any offer by Sasken > Communication > Technologies Limited ("Sasken") unless sent with that express intent and > with due > authority of Sasken. Sasken has taken enough precautions to prevent the > spread of > viruses. However the company accepts no liability for any damage caused by > any virus > transmitted by this email > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subjectunsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- Best Regards Mridul Dutta IBM India Pvt Ltd, Embassy Golf Links, Bangalore. Email:- mriddutt@xxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:50:34 +0200 From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <D216FFA163A947E7AD65B7FF31210989@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM: You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference (and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of RHEL's up2date and the RHN. I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4 machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for support and updates for CentOS. See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35 . 8-) [off-track] I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and came across CentOS and haven't looked back since. [on-track] HTH. > Matt, > > Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind of > a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose. I > believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't happen > - I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way! :) > > > I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's > BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm > pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now. > > Will see what the boss says on Monday... > > Thanks very much for your reply. > > Johan > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18 > To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S > > Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can > install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver > support. > Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you can > place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe > create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require > direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to > virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS which > supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual > infrastructure. > > Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4 > year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it > essential that REHL5 is run on this one? > > Just some thoughts for you... > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S > > I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the Adaptec > web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be the OEM. > > > Johan Booysen wrote: >> I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server >> that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID >> 2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down on >> short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda does not >> detect any disks on the server during installation. >> >> Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find a >> driver that will work? >> >> Thanks very much. >> >> Johan > > -- > > veritatis simplex oratio est > -Seneca > > Andrew Bacchi > Systems Programmer > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809 > > http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/ > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: > 10/18/2007 > 9:54 AM > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: > 10/18/2007 > 9:54 AM > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:51:53 +0200 From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 21 To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <154EE9EFA1234C98844A58BD171A5CA9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Masamy, Juda (SSO - Rehovot) <> scribbled on Sunday, October 21, 2007 10:57 AM: What filesystems do you use on your remote and local machine? > I have a problem with wu-ftpd I cannot upload file that is more than 2G > I have fc6 Linux. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:08:46 +0100 From: "Johan Booysen" <johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S To: <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <3D48C842BD295548968848572119008C0900E4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the driver I need..? Thanks for the suggestion, though! Johan -----Original Message----- From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51 To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM: You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference (and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of RHEL's up2date and the RHN. I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4 machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for support and updates for CentOS. See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide: http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35 . 8-) [off-track] I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and came across CentOS and haven't looked back since. [on-track] HTH. > Matt, > > Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind > of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose. > I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't > happen > - I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way! > :) > > > I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's > BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm > pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now. > > Will see what the boss says on Monday... > > Thanks very much for your reply. > > Johan > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18 > To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S > > Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can > install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver > support. > Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you > can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe > create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require > direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to > virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS > which supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual > infrastructure. > > Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4 > year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it > essential that REHL5 is run on this one? > > Just some thoughts for you... > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S > > I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the > Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be the OEM. > > > Johan Booysen wrote: >> I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server >> that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID >> 2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down >> on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda >> does not detect any disks on the server during installation. >> >> Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find >> a driver that will work? >> >> Thanks very much. >> >> Johan > > -- > > veritatis simplex oratio est > -Seneca > > Andrew Bacchi > Systems Programmer > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809 > > http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/ > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: > 10/18/2007 > 9:54 AM > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: > 10/18/2007 > 9:54 AM > > > -- > > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:25:19 +0200 From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S To: "'General Red Hat Linux discussion list'" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <A36D3EC5077A4D679DBACDC20EEAF0D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Johan Booysen <mailto:johan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> scribbled on Monday, October 22, 2007 10:09 AM: Not so sure about that, as I've noticed that CentOS seems to have more device support. Without going into specifics, I've managed to install CentOS a while ago in VMWare server using virtual scsi-drives that RHEL didn't cope with at the time. Dito for some physical machines. Maybe CentOS has more user-centric repos available than RHEL does, which could account for more hw-support or something to that effect. I'm speculating heavily now though. 8-) Give it a go though, it can't more than fail (it's free as well, so why hold back, after all it's a lab-machine right?), and in that case at least you'll know it doesn't work with CentOS and will have a reference for the future. Only because Oracale isn't certified for CentOS doesn't mean it won't run. 8-) > I don't think management over here will go for CentOS. Besides, if > CentOS is the same as Red Hat, I assume that it too will not have the > driver I need..? > > Thanks for the suggestion, though! > > Johan > > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu > Sent: 22 October 2007 07:51 > To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' > Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S > > Johan Booysen <> scribbled on Friday, October 19, 2007 6:28 PM: > > You should do fine with CentOS5 as a replacement for RHEL5. CentOS is > binary compatible, a clone if you want, of RHEL. Only real difference > (and the one I can care slightly about) is that CentOS has had all the > RHEL-logos etc stripped and that it uses yum for updating instead of > RHEL's up2date and the RHN. > > I use CentOS myself for trying out stuff before deploying to our RHEL3/4 > machines. So far so good. I also like the fact that CentOS is supported > as long as RHEL is. Redhat will support v5 until 2011?), and since > CentOS is basically the same thing as RHEL, the same will be true for > support and updates for CentOS. > > See this thread on the CentOS forums, it might help you decide: > http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=3107&forum=35 > . 8-) > > [off-track] > I used Fedora before to try out stuff before, but thought the fast > update-cycle was a bit too bleeding edge. I searched around a while and > came across CentOS and haven't looked back since. > [on-track] > > HTH. > > > >> Matt, >> >> Good question, and a very valid point. But anyway, this box is kind >> of a test-lab Oracle server, and needs to be RHEL5 for that purpose. >> I believe it will be pretty heavily used, so virtualizing it won't happen >> - I'll bet my last penny on that, and on the Springboks, by the way! :) >> >> >> I think the next thing to do is to perhaps flash the Adaptec adapter's > >> BIOS to a newer version, and then see if the driver will load...I'm >> pretty certain that I've exhausted all other options for now. >> >> Will see what the boss says on Monday... >> >> Thanks very much for your reply. >> >> Johan >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt >> Sent: 19 October 2007 17:18 >> To: 'General Red Hat Linux discussion list' >> Subject: RE: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S >> >> Perhaps this is not the answer you are looking for, but maybe you can >> install another distro (Fedora or an older CENTOS) to get driver support. >> Also, could using a virtual server work? I am just wondering if you >> can place something like CENT as the host OS then run VMWare and maybe > >> create a virtual machine with RHEL5? Perhaps this VM will not require > >> direct hardware support for the controller? You might be able to >> virtualize part of your infrastructure as well and run a legacy OS >> which supports your controller - then, include this box in the virtual > >> infrastructure. >> >> Maybe the real question is why is it that you need to run RHEL5 on a 4 > >> year old box? I am not saying there is a problem with it, but is it >> essential that REHL5 is run on this one? >> >> Just some thoughts for you... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx >> [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] >> On Behalf Of Andrew Bacchi >> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:41 AM >> To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list >> Subject: Re: Adaptec SCSI RAID 2000S >> >> I hope you've already solved this problem. Have you checked the >> Adaptec web site for a Linux driver? If anyone has one, it would be the >> OEM. >> >> >> Johan Booysen wrote: >>> I urgently need advice on this: I need to install RHEL5 on a server >>> that is probably about 4 years old. It contains an Adaptec SCSI RAID > >>> 2000S adapter, and there is no driver available that I can track down > >>> on short notice (and none included on the RHEL5 discs). Anaconda >>> does not detect any disks on the server during installation. >>> >>> Anyone know what my best bet is to get around this, or where to find a >>> driver that will work? >>> >>> Thanks very much. >>> >>> Johan >> >> -- >> >> veritatis simplex oratio est >> -Seneca >> >> Andrew Bacchi >> Systems Programmer >> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute >> phone: 518.276.6415 fax: 518.276.2809 >> >> http://www.rpi.edu/~bacchi/ >> >> -- >> >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: >> 10/18/2007 9:54 AM >> >> >> No virus found in this outgoing message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.0/1077 - Release Date: >> 10/18/2007 9:54 AM >> >> >> -- >> >> redhat-list mailing list >> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list ------------------------------ __ redhat-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list End of redhat-list Digest, Vol 44, Issue 23 ******************************************* -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
