Thanks for the reply Justin. Why would you suggest 4 over 5, because it is new or are there other reasons? Vince > -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Justin Zygmont > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 4:34 PM > To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list > Subject: Re: RHEL 4 or 5 AS 64Bit OS > > Esquivel, Vicente wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > > > Is anyone running 64bit RHEL 4 or 5 AS on an intel based Dell Power > > Edge 2950 with 2x(dual core) Xeon Woodcrest processors with 16GB of > > RAM, since this is not true 64bit hardware but rather it is > 32bit with > > 64bit extensions. Dell claims that it supports 64bit RHEL > on this hardware. > > > > Can anyone tell me if there are having problems doing this or if > > there would be anything I should take into consideration > when trying > > to decide to run 32bit RHEL or 64bit RHEL. The application I will > > running on this server supports both 32 or 64 bit. > > > I have one of those, I know rhel 64 bit will work well with > it, but I can't remember if it already had the drivers for > the PERC5i or not, you may need to use a driver disk. > Unfortunately windoze had to go onto it instead, and Dell > doesn't know much about their own stuff. > > I think rhel 5, 64 bit would be the best for you, hope it helps.. > > > > > Justin Zygmont > System and Network Administrator > Cityfone Telecommunications Inc > > 604.629.8841 > justin at cityfone dot net > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
