RE: Firewalled NTP on Redhat - ntpdate works, but ntpq doesn't

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, 123/UDP is open in both directions.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx]  On Behalf Of Stephen Carville
Sent:	Friday, May 18, 2007 3:01 PM
To:	General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject:	Re: Firewalled NTP on Redhat - ntpdate works, but ntpq doesn't

Young, Mike wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm seeing an odd NTP problem on a couple of Redhat servers here.
> Basically the NTP client is on a firewalled DMZ, away from the NTP server.
> NTP updates via ntpq work fine on the local NTP server subnet, but it
> isn't working for hosts on the firewalled DMZ.  We've checked ports on the
> firewall, and 123/UDP is open.  In addition, we see packets incrementing
> when we use the "iostat" command in ntpdc, and don't see any dropped or
> ignored packets in iostat either.
> 
> Any ideas?

Does the firewall allow port 123 in _both_ directions?  NTP requires 
unrestricted access to 123/udp for _both_ source and destination.

> Thanks,
> Mike.
> 


-- 
Stephen Carville <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Systems Engineer
Land America
1.626.667.1450 X326

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux