Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Res wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Robert Canary wrote:

security wrote:
Robert Canary:
Huh?  What security holes??


http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19714
fixed 8.13.8, but like so what. Sendmail spawns new processes. DOS one process and another will open for the next mail request. For sendmail you can only DOS the spawn you opened.


They also seem to forget that sendmail accounts for 60% of the worlds MTA, qmail probably 35% and the rest 5%, now when postfix grows to a large userbase, its going to be a sure thing many bugs and dangerous security holes will be found.

Here's an article from O'Reilly that suggest a somewhat different distribution.

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/sysadmin/2007/01/05/fingerprinting-mail-servers.html

--
Stephen Carville <stephen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Systems Engineer
Land America

--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux