Re: SUGGESTON FOR: HIGH END MAIL SERVER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



security wrote:
Robert Canary:
Huh?  What security holes??


http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19714
fixed 8.13.8, but like so what. Sendmail spawns new processes. DOS one process and another will open for the next mail request. For sendmail you can only DOS the spawn you opened.

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/18433
The vendor has released version 8.13.7 to address this issue.

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17192
The vendor has released version 8.13.6 to address this issue.

http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/17207
...
...
...



Ben wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, security wrote:

Which is the best MTA to handle mail services ?? ( Qmail, POSTFIX
-- or any other )
Postfix is a good choice, but it seems that sendmail is faster
(there is
more security holes, but .. it run faster)
Hasn't anyone thought of Exim (-:

Ben




--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux