Re: Question with regards to NFS mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, I second that ("any file manager"). Konqueror gives me a much more realictic figure as a non privileged user...Are you mounting with nfs2 or nfs3?


George Magklaras wrote:
One explanation (assuming that your NFS handles are not stale and probably they are not from what you are writing) is that when you use the Gnome File Manager, the userid you are currently logged as and invokes the GFM application does not have sufficient privileges to read all the subdirs under the exported /nas folder. The df reports the result of the export from processes that have permissions to see the entire partition and pass the NFS attributes to the client. That is not true for the GFM (or any file manager that reads parts of an exported fs with certain non global user privileges) and it that case it will silently omit from the sum the dirs or files it does not have access to. If you open (under GFM) the /nas share you should clearly see that some of the dirs are restricted (the icon indicates that with a 'restricted' sign), then you should verify what I am saying. On the contrary, if you executed the file manager on the server side as root, you should get the full story.



--
--
George B. Magklaras

Senior Computer Systems Engineer/UNIX Systems Administrator
The Biotechnology Centre of Oslo,
University of Oslo
http://www.biotek.uio.no/

EMBnet Norway: http://www.biotek.uio.no/EMBNET/

Tel: +47-22840535

--


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux