Re: version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Ed for your reply. I am using Redhat distribution, and after
googling, the only answer to this issue was setting the environment
variable as LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.x

But this method failed in my case. As while upgrading glibc, I
included the kernel headers with it.

Can you tell me what all packages would i need to re-install, before
loading glibc?

Thanks and Regards,
Nupur

On 10/15/05, Ed Wilts <ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:44:51PM +0530, Nupur wrote:
> > I have installed Glibc-2.3.5 over Glibc-2.1.92.
>
> You've seriously hurt yourself.  Most Linux distributions are simply not
> designed to handle a change to glibc without a lot of other updates.
>
> Your best alternative is to re-install.  You may be able to fix
> some packages by downloading the source rpm and rebuilding but I
> wouldn't count on it.
>
> --
> Ed Wilts, RHCE
> Mounds View, MN, USA
> mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx
> Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux