Re: version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 03:44:51PM +0530, Nupur wrote:
> I have installed Glibc-2.3.5 over Glibc-2.1.92. 

You've seriously hurt yourself.  Most Linux distributions are simply not
designed to handle a change to glibc without a lot of other updates.

Your best alternative is to re-install.  You may be able to fix
some packages by downloading the source rpm and rebuilding but I
wouldn't count on it.  

-- 
Ed Wilts, RHCE
Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux