Re: Mail Attack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks, Ed and Jason. It will be in our consideration.

Have any of you heard of BitDefender?

Jessica


On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Jason Huddleston wrote:

> Ed Wilts wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:36:33AM -0400, Jessica Zhu wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>I will try to contact them and also will consider to get another big box 
> >>if our current one cannot co-op with the situation.
> >>
> >>If I get another one, I'd like to set up multi-layer on it to scan virus, 
> >>spam and prevent forge. Do you guys have any structure suggestion for 
> >>this?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I've been happy with MailScanner.  There are options to have the mail be
> >processed for spam (i.e. spam assassin), virii using a number of
> >products (clamav, f-prot, plus others).  Overall, it's a nicely
> >integrated product set (open source of course).  www.mailscanner.info
> >
> >        .../Ed
> >
> >  
> >
> I can second that. I have been using MailScanner for a few years without 
> any hiccups.
> 
> 

-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux