Just to pour oil on the fire, it took me ages to configure or even make sense of the 'bind' configuration. And I had that fat O'Reilly book to help out.
With tinydns/dnscache (including compilation) I was done in 6h flat.
The only sad thing is that the unpatched tinydns does not do DNS round-robin and that DJB's comments look a bit on the 'arrogant' side. But I can live with that.
YMMV of course.
--On Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:15 AM +1000 Res <res@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Steve Phillips wrote:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. wrote:
Also, consider binning "bind" and moving to "tinydns".
If the user doesn't understand how dns doesn't really need to cluster due to its nature, then suggesting he use one of dan burnsteins packages is just begging for trouble. It would be a lot better to use bind to start with and maybe in a few years consider looking at it (if at all).
Probably one of the bernstein trolls, to make comment as dumb assed as this.
-- Regards, Res
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-- David Tonhofer
M-PLIFY S.A. Resp. Informatique 47, av. de la Liberté L-1931 Luxembourg Tel: +352 261846-52 Fax: +352 261846-46 Mob: +352 021-139031
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
