----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Wood" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "General Red Hat Linux discussion list" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 3:27 PM Subject: Re: Advanced Server free? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Reuben D. Budiardja"> > > GPL does not necessarily mean it's free. it means that they have to > provide > > the source to the person they distribute the binay to. To continue with that though, that (to me) would "imply" that possession of RH's code would mean WBEL *shouldn't* be redistributing what it has - even if RH is offering up SRPMs to the world. Because, WBEL and it's downloader aren't RH customers and don't have the pure RHEL binaries. Yeah, I know WBEL <> RHEL but the symantics are confusing. That's why I frequently hear the "you'll be out of compliance" rather than a more strong statement - "illegal". I still think this refers mainly to support and binary format of updates. -Eric Wood -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list