-----Original Message-----
From: redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hamilton, Andrew
Sent: Mittwoch, 26. Mai 2004 15:10
To: General Red Hat Linux discussion list
Subject: RE: Apache 2.0.x on ES 2.1I never use a canned version of apache from Red Hat. I think more important than trying to use a default version is to figure out what you really want the web server to do and compile it yourself. That way you get the options that YOU want not what someone else thinks you want. Apache is NOT difficult to compile. If you want an rpm you can get the source rpm then just use the spec file, modify it to get the options you want then build the rpm. I'm not sure it's worth the effort if you are only doing it for one machine, but some folks like having the rpm's so that it's part of rpm system for updates and such.
regards,
Drew
-----Original Message-----
From: boesigerc@xxxxxxx [mailto:boesigerc@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 8:32 AM
To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Apache 2.0.x on ES 2.1
Hello
We like to migrate two Reverse Proxies from Sun Solaris to RedHat Linux.
Unfortunately there is RedHat ES 2.1 running and the Reverse Proxy
Application Module is written for Apache 2.0. Therefore we are
challanged to install Apache 2.0.x on a ES 2.1 System. My favorit would
be to simply install a binary version using rpm. Does offically such a
Version exist? If not, does somebody know the configure arguments used
to compile apache on ES 3.0 for example, so I can compile the server as
close to the official version as possible?Any help appreciated.
Regards,
Cedric Boesiger
--
Die Schweizerische Post
PostFinance
Informatik
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
