Re: Secondary Mail Server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 07:52:00AM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 03:22 3/16/2004, you wrote:
> >second thing your dns and sendmail both are on same machine this might 
> >cause problem as your dns have to be on separate machine.
> 
> False.
> 
> There is nothing that requires sendmail and BIND to run on separate 
> machines, and in light-traffic situations there is no real benefit either.

For high load activity, it's very advantageous to actually have bind
running on a sendmail server.  sendmail does a *LOT* of dns activity.

-- 
Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA
mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx
Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux