Re: kernel image too large ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On February 2, 2004 06:42 pm, Ashish Samant wrote:
> Hi...
>
> I am in the middle of building a new kernel (2.4.20) and this is my
> first attempt. I have got as far as configuring it with 'make xconfig' ,
> followed by 'make dep', 'make clean' and 'make bzImage'.
>
> So far so good, but I did get these messages after the the kernel image
> was created :
>
> ......
>
> Root device is (3,3)
> Boot sector is 512 bytes
> Setup is 4667 bytes
> System is 1028 Kb
> warning : kernel is too big for standalone boot from floppy.
> .......
>
> What does that signify ? Have I chosen too many modules and options during
> the config process ? Is that kernel image alarmingly huge and do I need to
> redo the whole thing ? Or can I proceed with the install ?
>
> Thanks for your time,
>
> Ashish Samant.


Hi Ashish,
It sounds like the image is fine, unless you are planning on putting it on a 
floppy disk. For the record, more modules, means less built into the kernel, 
which means a smaller kernel.

-- 
Pete Nesbitt, rhce


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux