Hmm, In the IDE setting wouldn't the "secondary" IDE drive be slower if the "primary" IDE drive is transmitting/receiving data. As far as I can find/remember that would be the foremost issue. HTH, Harry Quoting Edward Dekkers <edward@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: *> Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: *> *> > On Sunday 30 November 2003 07:29 pm, Edward Dekkers wrote: *> > *> >>Pete Nesbitt wrote: *> >> *> >>>On November 28, 2003 04:07 pm, Reuben D. Budiardja wrote: *> >>> *> >>>>Hi all, *> >>>>Is it true that secondary IDE is slower than Primary? I have a brand new *> >>>>Western Digital 120 GB 7200 RPM HD, and because I don't have a place on *> >>>>the primary IDE, I unplug the (unused) CD-ROM and use the secondary IDE *> >>>>as the harddrive connection. -- Harry Hoffman hhoffman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #----------------------------------------------------------------# # Harry: version 4.0a # # Known bugs: # # 1) Verbal output may occur before data processing is complete. # # 2) Loudspeaker option may activate without being invoked. # # 3) Other bugs as reported # #----------------------------------------------------------------# ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IpSolutions: http://www.ip-solutions.net/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
