On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:43 am, martynas@xxxxxxx wrote:
> yes..the same problem as mine.. I dont want to use ext3 on root partition
> for some reasons.. and I use ext3 only on other partitions, so I would like
> to correct this redhat 9 behaviour... it's pain every time to go somehwere
> to check clean FS ( i have systems in serveral places).. maybe it is worth
> to send this as bug? Or maybe somebody knows, how to fix it?
Maybe this has kinda gone unnoticed because the default for RH 9 is ext3, and
we're the only few that don't follow the norm. I'd wait a bit to see if
someone knows anything about this. If not and you report a bug, could you let
me know the bug number and I'll help confirm it.
I wonder if this behavior still exists with Fedora Core 1.
Thanks
RDB
> --- "Reuben D. Budiardja" <techlist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 07:36 am, martynas@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I installed redhat 9 on several systems and have one big problem. After
> > > unclean shutdown fsck allways fails - fsck checks file system and after
> > > that it ALLWAYS drops me to repair shell. In most cases after that fsck
> > > shows (when I run fsck manually from repair shell), taht system is
> > > CLEAN! So, it MUST to pass fsck automatically and lload the system. In
> > > this situation, I had some cases, when I had to go to redhat 9 system
> > > (that is in other place I work), run fsck manually and get the result,
> > > that FS is clean;/
<snip>
--
Reuben D. Budiardja
Department of Physics and Astronomy
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
---------------------------------------------------------
"To be a nemesis, you have to actively try to destroy
something, don't you? Really, I'm not out to destroy
Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional
side effect."
- Linus Torvalds -
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
