I suspected something like this, but it must mean that Redhat compiles their distribution RPM with such support. Is there any way to verify this. Btw Hal, I seem to recognize your name from discussions about Netscape fonts many moons ago.
Peter
Hal Burgiss wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 08:57:31PM +1000, Peter B. West wrote:
If I now download and install Mozilla 1.5, copying the /usr/bin/mozilla scritp from the 1.4 RPM, making the appropriate modifications, the font picture is completely different. Now the fotnconfig system fonts are not available, and if I select Luxi or Vera, the results are terrible. What's going on?
Guessing: one is compiled with XFT support and the other is not. XFT support is fairly recent.
-- Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
-- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
