> -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Bret Hughes > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:53 AM > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: C++ lib compatibility between Red Hat 9 and 7.3 > > On Fri, 2003-10-17 at 10:37, Otto Haliburton wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list- > admin@xxxxxxxxxx] > > > On Behalf Of Jonathan Bartlett > > > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:18 AM > > > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: C++ lib compatibility between Red Hat 9 and 7.3 > > > > > > Otto is a troll. Let's stop feeding him. The obvious double standard > is > > > apparent (i.e. - Windows can break compatibility because they are > > > improving their architecture, but Linux cannot, because systems like > > > Windows never would, and I'm ignoring the fact that Sun and others do > > > this as a amtter of course, too, but I'll blame it on the "lack of > > > resources" of open-source developers, even though it occurs with > everyone > > > in the industry). > > > Guys can you take this off list? This thread is going nowhere but > downhill. This list is typically pretty courteous as far as technical > lists go, and I find the regression to name calling extremely > distasteful and nonproductive. > > Otto you obviously feel very strongly about this and appear to by quite > knowlegable. Why don't you take your thoughts to the gcc developer list > as has been suggested. > > I am pretty easy going most of the time but you are rapidly approaching > the point that I will have to edit the old Procmail/others.rc file and > send you to /dev/null. > > Bret > I agree. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
