> -----Original Message----- > From: redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Otto Haliburton > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 4:06 PM > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: C++ lib compatibility between Red Hat 9 and 7.3 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:redhat-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx] > > On Behalf Of Hal Burgiss > > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 3:12 PM > > To: redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: C++ lib compatibility between Red Hat 9 and 7.3 > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 06:32:58PM -0500, Otto Haliburton wrote: > > > Ideas grow from debate and criticism. New things are tried because > > somebody > > > disagreed or decided on a better way to do it. As I will say again. > > You > > > are prone to talk out of the wrong end. > > > > Maybe so, but I've never had the problems you had here (using RH since > > ~'97). I guess my "wrong end" has more brain power than your "right > > end". > > > > I doubt many of the RH users on this list care, much less have the > > ability to fix or even make a decision that will lead to some > > improvement. If you seriously think you have grand, novell ideas, and > > want to see improvements, pitch it on the gcc developers list. > > > > -- > > Hal Burgiss > > > > > There you go again talking of the wrong end. And further, I could understand the problem if it was different vendors. Imagine the problems if you bought a Borland compiler and then upgraded to a latter version of the same compiler and it didn't work. That's what you have here and that is totally unacceptable. It's okay if Borland c++ and GCC c++ are incompatible you sort of expect that, although if they are using the same standards they shouldn/t. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
