Re: SNMP + MRTG... WTF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: RE: SNMP + MRTG... WTF?


> First off, it WORKED! Thanks to Brett and Steve for the key pieces of
help.
> Of course, some further questions on the subject for resolution:
>
> At 05:23 10/15/2003, you wrote:
> >You might consider running a less restrictive snmpd until you get things
> >figured out, try changing the sec.model section to any. i.e.
> >
> >group     MyRWGroup     any     local
> >group     MyROGroup     any      mynetwork
> >
> >Now you can make a v1 or v2c type query.
>
> Based on the error messages (many hundreds of them) which I got from MRTG
> in the course of testing, it seems like MRTG uses v1 queries.
Nevertheless,
> I set this to "any" as you suggested, which is fine except for two errors
> in /var/log/messages when snmpd is restarted. Those errors say:
>
> Oct 13 21:11:26 apollo ucd-snmp[22520]: /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 76:
> Error: bad security model "any" should be: v1, v2c or usm - installing
anyway
> Oct 13 21:11:26 apollo ucd-snmp[22520]: /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf: line 77:
> Error: bad security model "any" should be: v1, v2c or usm - installing
anyway
>
> What should I do here to correct this error and make it go away?
>
> Also, three more questions, now directly related to the MRTG output:
>
>          1. "The statistics were last updated... blah, blah... at which
> time 'apollo.paiz.org' had been up for 2:01:10." The actual uptime is
> around 12 days... where is snmpd/mrtg getting its data, and how can I make
> sure that it gets the correct data?

This is because the SNMPD module has been up and running  for
2:01:10....snmpd restart will show "System Uptime" of 0:00:01  not the
"timeticks" of the server itself.

>
>          2. I have a screen resolution of 1400x1050 on my notebook, and
> 1280x1024 on my desktop. The charts seem to be optimized for 640x480 or
> something... they look tiny. Can I either make them larger, or maybe put
> two interface charts side by side? (This box only has two interfaces, so
> being able to see both at once would be nice too.)


Can't Help Yah Here.


>
>          3. I have a 256 Kbps link... should I set MaxBytes to exactly
> 32000 or 32768? I know it's for display only, but what is the _correct_
value?
>



256Kbps = 32KB
See http://www.perfectnetusa.com/kilo.htm





> Thanks again for all the help, guys.
>
>
> -- 
> Rodolfo J. Paiz
> rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux