Re: Lousy answers [was: Re: Is mysql 4.x in future Redhat release]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sounds like we need an FAQ!

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R Sánchez" <reven@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:59 AM
Subject: Lousy answers [was: Re: Is mysql 4.x in future Redhat release]


> Hi there list.
>
> I just felt something had to be said here. In the last few weeks I've seen
a
> lot of really lousy answers, the most of them with the Red Hat 10/Fedora
> stuff, but there have been others. Every now and then someone new stops in
> to the list and asks a question everybody else has already made. Of course
> google'n before asking would reduce mail load on the list, but maybe a
> newbie is stunned by 230000 results, most of them speaking of things
he/her
> doesn't really understand yet. Maybe it's easier to get a direct and
simple
> answer form someone who had/has the same problem and has already solved
it.
>
> As far as I remember, it's not mandatory for someone to answer. So if you
> don't have anything intelligent to say, just shut your mouth. I'm sure if
we
> check the list's stats, absurd answers talking about google, any other
> search engine or references like "check a post from 1967 when this was
> already...", might sum the same load than all the questions made twice.
>
> The point is: if talking (again) about a subject really annoys you, then
> simply don't talk. You'll be more polite that way. Maybe your crappy
answers
> annoy the list even more that a repeated question annoys you.
>
> Regards,
>
> Reven
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Edward Croft" <ecroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Red Hat List" <redhat-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Is mysql 4.x in future Redhat release?
>
>
> | On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 02:01, Edward Dekkers wrote:
> | > Wayne Betts wrote:
> | >
> | > > I'd like to know if Redhat has plans to incorporate mysql 4.x into a
> | > > release sometime soon (instead of the current 3.x version).
> | > > (I know that I can build/install mysql 4.0x myself if needed -- 
that's
> | > > not my question.)
> | > >
> | > > Any info on redhat's adoption of mysql 4.x will be appreciated.
> | > >
> | > > Wayne
> | >
> | > So why ask here? With one exception I know of, nobody here works at
> RedHat.
> | >
> | > Regards,
> | > Ed.
> | >
> | Well, gee Ed, I think the fact that this is a Red Hat list and that
maybe
> just maybe,
> | someone in a Red Hat list might just know something. Really! I love how
> some people in
> | this group spout off about netiquette and such. Don't top post, no html,
> don't ask questions
> | unless you have googled, alta vista'ed, yahooed, wrote the pope, gotten
> | thirteen signatures and kissed someones arse. Just the other day,
> | someone came back into the group and asked about RHL 10. He got jumped
> | on and told that before he asked a question to go to the archives,
> | google, etc. Sorry, I am not that rude... [trimmed]
>
>
> -- 
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux