Re: up2date not up to date?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 09:13:04 -0700, David Demner wrote:

> I have a question about up2date.  I recently noticed that the most recent version of OpenSSL available on their website was version 0.9.7c (which purportedly contains important bugfixes) but the most recent version available on RHN was version 0.9.7a.  Same thing with BIND (version 9.2.2 on their website and version 9.2.1 on RHN).
> 
> Is this bad?  Should I be updating my system from the product websites and not using RHN?  Doesn't this defeat the purpose of up2date?

http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_backport.html

- -- 
Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/hZM90iMVcrivHFQRAlewAJ9iAs4nUGxCrY71eV1vc6THWsOtFQCfW0pr
boRCMc6mNFhwueHBVf0SJxY=
=MXzz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux