Re: Raid on a raid issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had to remove the four entries that were created during the installation
that were later made into a raid.

On startup, when the system tried to mount the original four entries, it
told me that the four were already in use and already mounted.

Then it didn't know what to do with the /dev/md127p1 raid, the raid that
was the combination of the four entries.

Eliminating the four entries in /etc/fstab, allowed the mounting of the
"new raid." and the boot up of the system.

I think the system was in a bad state because of the raid on raid
situation.  I just wanted confirmation.


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Jamie Fargen <jfargen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Margaret,
> You mentioned you had to remove the four original portions from being
> mounted  in /etc/fstab? I imagine you did that so the system would start?
>
> Could it just be that the system was in a bad state when you tried to
> connect?
>
> On Jul 24, 2014 3:49 PM, "Doll, Margaret Ann" <margaret_doll@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > The missing network route would be a good guess except that last week,
> > samba, ping and ssh were working across from one subnet to another.
> >
> > I did ask the networking group whether there seemed to be some block
> > between the rask, the new computer and my desktop.  Network said there
> were
> > no blocks.  The connection into rask was just timing out.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Jonathan Billings <jsbillin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Doll, Margaret Ann <
> > > margaret_doll@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is the ssh timeout problem, ping problem and samba problem all caused
> by
> > > > the raid on raid creation?  The timing of the creation of the new
> raid
> > > > indicates that it is.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not directly.  Most likely, something else was broken at the same time.
> > >  The RAID issue is a red herring.  It sounds to me like your system is
> > > reachable from the local subnet but not from other subnets?  That
> sounds
> > > like a missing network route to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jonathan Billings <jsbillin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > --
> > > redhat-list mailing list
> > > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> > >
> > --
> > redhat-list mailing list
> > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list




[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux