Re: Bug 80018: NFSv4 on RHEL 6.2 over six times slower than 5.7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Corey Kovacs wrote:
> Maybe it takes posting your config to the list so we can see if you made a

The config's the same for 5.8 and 6.3, I think. I do know my manager
worked on it some, and had done some work with NFS 4 configuration.

I can check with my manager, but I believe that we'd be willing to send
that to RHEL; I don't know that he'd want it posted publicly, for security
reasons (but I could be wrong; I'll ask him).

> mistake. Are you a paying customer actually using RHEL? If this a real bug
> I doubt it would be so ignored. Anyone else having a similar problem?

This is 100% reproducible. A user found it on CentOS 6.2; we tried it on
several servers, then went to an RHEL one. All identical responses.
>
> Lets start by being sensible and not antagonistic.

At what point would you decide to "allow" me to be antagonistic?

Let me restate my case: I opened a bugzilla case under my own account.
After weeks, I used the email address for support: yes, we *do* have a
contract with RHEL, and we are a US federal gov't agency. It's been
something like two weeks, and I've not seen a response.

The *only* thing that happened on the bug was they waited about a month,
then there was a followup, if you read it, that they were on 6.3, and so
they put it to dontfix.

*That's* why I'm posting all over. This is the *first* responses I've
gotten. I guess it *does* take public humiliation.

       mark
>
> C
> On Jul 10, 2012 7:52 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> For any redhatters on the list, I'm going to be reopening this bug
>> today.
>>
>> I am also VERY unhappy with Redhat. I filed the bug months ago, and it
>> was
>> *never* assigned - no one apparently even looked at it. It's a
>> show-stopper for us, since it hits us on our home directory servers.
>>
>> A week or so ago, I updated our test system to 6.3, and *nothing* has
>> changed. Unpack a large file locally, and it's seconds. Unpack from an
>> NFS-mounted directory to a local disk takes about 1.5min. NFS mount
>> either
>> an ext3 or ext4 fs, cd to that directory, and I run a job to unpack a
>> large file to the NFS-mounted directory, and it's between 6.5 and 7.5
>> *MINUTES*. We cannot move our home directory servers to 6.x with this
>> unacknowledged ->BUG<-.
>>
>> Large file is defined as a 28M .gz file, unpacked to 92M.
>>
>> This is 100% repeatable.
>>
>> I tried sending an email to our support weeks ago, and got no response.
>> Maybe it takes shaming in a public forum to get anyone to acknowledge
>> this
>> exists....
>>
>>          mark
>>
>> --
>> redhat-list mailing list
>> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>>
> --
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux