Maybe it takes posting your config to the list so we can see if you made a mistake. Are you a paying customer actually using RHEL? If this a real bug I doubt it would be so ignored. Anyone else having a similar problem? Lets start by being sensible and not antagonistic. C On Jul 10, 2012 7:52 AM, <m.roth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For any redhatters on the list, I'm going to be reopening this bug today. > > I am also VERY unhappy with Redhat. I filed the bug months ago, and it was > *never* assigned - no one apparently even looked at it. It's a > show-stopper for us, since it hits us on our home directory servers. > > A week or so ago, I updated our test system to 6.3, and *nothing* has > changed. Unpack a large file locally, and it's seconds. Unpack from an > NFS-mounted directory to a local disk takes about 1.5min. NFS mount either > an ext3 or ext4 fs, cd to that directory, and I run a job to unpack a > large file to the NFS-mounted directory, and it's between 6.5 and 7.5 > *MINUTES*. We cannot move our home directory servers to 6.x with this > unacknowledged ->BUG<-. > > Large file is defined as a 28M .gz file, unpacked to 92M. > > This is 100% repeatable. > > I tried sending an email to our support weeks ago, and got no response. > Maybe it takes shaming in a public forum to get anyone to acknowledge this > exists.... > > mark > > -- > redhat-list mailing list > unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
